Elimination of Nasrallah: who condemned, who remained silent, who supported? – WZO

Elimination of Nasrallah: who condemned, who remained silent, who supported?

The assassination of Hezbollah’s leader Hassan Nasrallah by Israel was a resonant event, and the world’s reaction to it was ambiguous. Direct condemnations and evasive comments — all this emphasizes that political statements on this matter say more about the politicians themselves than about the incident itself.

Photo: ecrow / depositphotos.com

1. Support for the assassination

The United States was one of the few that openly supported the assassination of Nasrallah. President Joe Biden called his death a “measure of justice” for numerous crimes against Americans, Israelis, and Lebanese. Vice President Kamala Harris reminded of his terrorist activities, noting that he had American blood on his hands. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also emphasized the historical significance of this event, calling it a “settling of scores” with a man responsible for thousands of deaths.

Argentine President Javier Milei also expressed approval: his advisor stated that “Israel eliminated one of the greatest modern murderers,” which led to the weakening of terrorist structures.

2. Avoidance towards escalation

Many world leaders avoided direct mention of Nasrallah and focused on the potential escalation of the conflict. Thus, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan condemned Israel, calling its actions genocide, but did not mention Nasrallah directly. Abu Mazen did similarly, expressing condolences to Lebanon, avoiding mention of the assassination.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock noted that the killing threatens to destabilize all of Lebanon and does not serve Israel’s security interests. Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani called on Italian citizens to immediately leave Lebanon, without comments regarding Nasrallah’s death.

3. Condemnation of Israel

On the other side of the political spectrum were countries and organizations that openly condemned Israel for the assassination of Nasrallah. Iran, funding Hezbollah, declared a five-day mourning for its ally. Ayatollah Khamenei called the killing an act of aggression and stated that Israel “will not go unpunished.” The Houthis in Yemen also stated that Nasrallah’s death will only strengthen their resistance.

The Russian Foreign Ministry called the assassination of Nasrallah “another political murder” and placed all responsibility for the subsequent escalation on Israel.

HAMAS and the Palestinian Authority, in turn, called Israel’s actions “barbaric aggression,” not forgetting to express their solidarity with Hezbollah and its leader.

Conclusion: Political reactions to the assassination of Nasrallah revealed lines of tension on the world stage. Support, avoidance, or direct condemnation — each leader chose their words based on their own interests.

30 Sep 2024
2 min read
1056
Recent news

Read more

Happy New Year

Happy New Year

Photo: JNaether / depositphotos.com Today is December 31 – the last day of 2023.
This day in history: an outstanding educator, writer, and doctor Janusz Korczak was born

This day in history: an outstanding educator, writer, and doctor Janusz Korczak was born

On July 22, 1878, in Warsaw, in an assimilated Jewish family of Goldschmidts, Henryk was born, named after his grandfather, a doctor, but who entered history as Janusz Korczak – an outstanding educator, writer, and humanist, whose life became a symbol of selflessness and love for children.
Terrorist attack in the Manchester synagogue: politics as a catalyst for antisemitism

Terrorist attack in the Manchester synagogue: politics as a catalyst for antisemitism

On October 2, 2025, on Yom Kippur — the holiest day of the Jewish calendar — a terrorist attack occurred at the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue in the Crumpsall area of North Manchester.